Why didn’t the CSIRO add the temperature data?

The CSIRO invites the public to a new web site

But Professor Sinclair Davidson notes a strange absence from their graphic - the temperature data.

So Davidson adds the Australian temperature data himself and by squashing the left hand axis enough you can't see any relationship between temperature and CO2.  So that's it, there is no relationship between CO2 and temperature - science settled

You can see why the CSIRO would rather not show this graph!

 

If the rest of the world is cutting, why are emissions rising?

Finally cause for celebration, the Guardian reports:

Greenhouse gas emissions increased by a record amount last year, to the highest carbon output in history, putting hopes of holding global warming to safe levels all but out of reach, according to unpublished estimates from the International Energy Agency… 

Last year, a record 30.6 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide poured into the atmosphere, mainly from burning fossil fuel – a rise of 1.6Gt on 2009...

.

More evidence of a scam

As I've said before, belief in man-made global warming will soon be laughed out of existence.

Reader Professor BobC runs a keen eye over the supposedly increasing atmospheric CO2 levels:

If you look at the caption I've given fig. 1, it says the increase in CO2 is natural CO2 variation. The warmists would have you believe that burning of fossil fuels is not part of the natural cycle and so somehow this increase in CO2 is anthropogenic.

Fig. 1 Natural CO2 Variation

Professor BobC continues:

If we now take a closer look at the last 5 years (Fig. 2 - which I've stretched a bit to help with visibility) we can see that, contrary to IPCC alarmism, there is no statistically significant uptrend.

Fig. 2

Case closed on the warmists I'd say.