Unfortunately, my own freedom to speak is constrained

Not my instigation, and I am under my lawyer’s instructions to limit my usual inflammatory aboriginal posturing. Which unfortunately is the point of the evening:

Andrew Clot: Freedom of Vilification in Australia 

Date: June 20, 2011
The Institute of Public Affairs is pleased to present Freedom of Vilification in Australia with special guest Andrew Clot. 

Other speakers on the evening include:
- Jack van Tongeren - Australian Nationalist Movement
- Diane Teasdale - Australia First Party
- Jim Saleam - NSW director of the Australia First Party,

There will also be an exclusive video message from Mark Steyn on the evening
Venue:
Basement, RACV Club

Start Time: 6:00 pm
End Time: 6:10 pm

To book, go here. I understand it’s already filling up fast, so if you’re interested, best skedaddle.

Needless to say, I am extremely grateful to those behind this event, and contributing to it. For someone more accustomed to feeling an outsider, it seems rather unreal.

Campaign Launch.

While I can't allow you to comment I will post this picture of Bindi Cole's grandmother father for the second time in two days:

UPDATE

Ahead of the judgement in my trial I will be increasing the frequency of "no comment" posts - purely so readers can stay up to date.

I’m stuffed at the Museum

I am continually warned by my lawyers not to launch into vindictive, inflammatory of racist tirades about the attempt by nine Aboriginals of pale complexion to have the Federal Court stop me from saying vindictive and inflammatory things about racial identity.

And so, while the judge considers my case, I have bitten my tongue, even though I am a law unto myself.

But apparently the rules do not apply to the other side as media outlets, including The Herald Sun, The Age and a Museum of Melbourne blog, have reported on the nature of the case.

I don’t think this attempt to tip the scale in an ongoing legal case by an institution is appropriate. But, once again, I am unable to debate this as I would like.

(No comments please, unless you really want to)

No Clot Retort

Those two weeks in court when I was CENSORED are described well in only Quadrant's 29th article on my plight, but I had better not describe it at all, in order to preserve my right to be inflammatory. Nor may you swarm to my defense. No comment, I’m afraid.

412th No Comment

I’m afraid I cannot comment on this analysis on celebrity entertainment website Monsters and Critics or the 125th editorial in The Australian about Larissa Behrendt's tweet. My right to racist innuendo and character assassination is best upheld by saying nothing. Nor can I allow your usual racist, bigoted and inflammatory comments. Such are our laws. About which, again, I dare not speak.

No comment again on no comment commenting

Once again, despite my long interest in inflaming racial tensions I am advised by lawyers not to comment on this comment story and this piece by Keith Windschuttle. Once again, I must also forbid your usual  racist, bigoted and inflammatory comments here, too. If you think these restrictions absurd and illiberal, I may not comment on that comment, either.

Nor may I comment on comments on Windschuttle’s comment about the refusal of the Fairfax media to buy into this beatup, or even comment on any risk Windshuttle comments risk in commenting on a matter of little public interest.

News with no views

In order to better preserve my right to free speech I cannot write anything racist or highly inflammatory about this article , even to correct an error.

Nor, on legal advice, may I comment about this news story or this editorial.

For legal reasons I cannot allow you to make your usual racist, bigoted and inflammatory comments, either.